SLIDER

So Disliked It
Showing posts with label So Disliked It. Show all posts

Quick Lit: July 2020 (Part Two)

Aug 14, 2020



I read 18 books in July, and I'm reviewing six of those books today. You can find thoughts on the other books in Quick Lit: July 2020 (Part One), posted yesterday. I'm excited to share the rest of my July reads, which were all so great with only one exception! If you enjoy this feature, check out other readers' reviews at Modern Mrs. Darcy.


LATE MIGRATIONS BY MARGARET RENKL – Another book that was on my radar because of my sister, though I ended up reading it first! She was looking up past Read with Jenna selections, and this one caught my eye. This collection of essays is part memoir and part nature writing but reads like poetry. Renkl alternates between observations on the natural world, primarily from her own backyard, and recollections from her family's history. At first, many of the essays seemed random to me – and I wasn't sure I understood the point. But the more I read, the more I found myself immersed in the beautiful storytelling and keen view of the world. The way Renkl explored loss and grief was so moving that I cried. It was unexpected favorite – a slow, beautiful book to savor – and I So Loved It.

A BURNING BY MEGHA MAJUMDAR – Once again, I read this book because of my sister. A Burning is set in India, and I loved that aspect! It's always fascinating to learn about another culture. This book follows three characters who want to change their station in life – to become middle class, to gain political power, and to find fame through film. But one reckless comment on Facebook spins a web that entangles all three characters in different ways. I loved how the book immediately caught my attention and moved quickly. Even with three POVs, this is a slim, restrained story and does so much without wasting words. I listened to the audiobook and thought the format added so much, too! I wasn't fully invested in the characters emotionally, but I still So Enjoyed It overall.

FRIENDS AND STRANGERS BY J. COURTNEY SULLIVAN – I loved Sullivan's The Engagements but wasn't fond of Saints for All Occasions, so I went into this with low expectations. Thankfully, it immediately became a new favorite! I love Sullivan's writing style, and it worked particularly well for me here. Her characters were well developed, and I was so invested in their lives. Even when I didn't like their decisions, I couldn't put the book down. It's a long and a little slow – there isn't a lot of action – but I loved how it explored motherhood, marriage, class, privilege, and a complicated friendship between a mother and her child's nanny. I'm So Obsessed With It because it worked so perfectly for me but probably wouldn't recommend it to everyone. But it's still on my mind weeks after finishing!


A MARRIAGE GAME BY SARA DESAI – What I expected from this book and what I got were two very different things. I loved the Indian culture, especially any scene involving the heroine's family or their restaurant. But everything else was painful. I should have DNFed, but I was 50% in before realizing just how much I hated it and then had to see how it ended. I wrote a more in-depth review on Goodreads if you're curious, but here are the five main reasons I didn't like it: an asshole hero, a revenge plot that led to an AWFUL conflict, a romance built solely on sexual attraction without much of an emotional connection, being told a character was smart when their actions are the total opposite, and over-the-top awful arranged marriage dates that lost all sense of realism. I So Disliked It.

DEVOTIONS BY MARY OLIVER – I almost never read poetry because I don't "get it" most of the time. But I recently had the itch to try something new, so I picked up this book. It's a collection of Oliver's poems spanning her decades-long career, and it's arranged from most recent (2015) to oldest (1963). It was interesting to read her work in reverse, and I enjoyed seeing what stayed consistent through the years.  She had a deep love and appreciation for the natural world and wrote so beautifully about it. Some poems were very moving but others were a little boring or repetitive. But that's more about me – my general disinterest in poetry and the fact that I'm more of an indoors person – than Oliver's work. She was a gifted writer and this was a lovely introduction to her. I So Enjoyed It.

NOTES ON A SILENCING BY LACY CRAWFORD – In this memoir, Crawford looks back at the time she spent at the elite St. Paul's School, the sexual assault she suffered there, and how that trauma affected her. It's a cerebral memoir – the writing felt literary in its crisp directness and is evidence that education was central to Crawford's adolescence. I loved how it examined power and privilege, silence and speaking out. The non-linear structure did not always work for me, but it's a minor quibble. It's more about the effect of being silenced than an investigation and exposé on the school itself, but I found it very insightful. I'd give this my equivalent to a four stars, So Enjoyed It, though the wording doesn't exactly work here. This was a heartbreaking, important read.

What have you been reading lately?

Quick Lit: March 2019

Apr 30, 2019


After finally catching up on my backlog of Quick Lit posts, I told myself that I could never get that far behind again. I think it took me longer to get motivated to start than it did to actually write the reviews. With that said, let's talk about what I read in March (right before we enter May haha!). I finished 21 books, and I'm chatting about 15 of them in today's post. Four others are briefly mentioned at the end, and the other two will be included in April's Quick Lit. As always, check out the linkup hosted by Modern Mrs. Darcy for more reviews and recommendations.


GRAVE MERCY, DARK TRIUMPH AND MORTAL HEART BY ROBIN LAFEVERS – After spending the month of February re-reading, you'd think that I would be eager to get back to the brand-new books. I found myself still craving familiar reads, so I decided to listen to this series on audio. And since the first book in the new companion duology released in February, I knew a memory refresh was in order before I picked up that one. I read this series at the height of their popularity years ago and hadn't re-read them since. I loved them then, but I kept wondering if they'd hold up. Fake spoiler alert: all three were still AMAZING! Why didn't I re-read them sooner?

My favorite will always be Dark Triumph because Sybella + Beast = magic, but I was surprised to find that Mortal Heart was even better than I'd remembered. Possibly even stronger than Grave Mercy? Gasp, I know! If you want more thoughts on these assassin nuns, here's my original series review since my re-read reaction is basically just ALL THE FEELS. As for the audiobooks, all three have different narrators. The first and third were just okay, in my opinion, but much better on 3x speed. The second was really good, and I was excited to see she narrates Sybella's POV in the newest book, too. I'm happy to say I'm still So Obsessed With this series.


MARIANA BY SUSANNA KEARSLEY – I've heard Kelly rave about this book for years, and I kept meaning to read it after I thoroughly enjoyed The Winter Sea. It's only my second book by this author, but I can already see similarities between them! This book was really grounded in the setting, and I loved that it was so important to the story. I'm generally not a fan of two timelines in books (one present and one historical, in this case), but I could see how both timelines had to exist for the story Kearsley was telling. The story and atmosphere were so well done, though I wanted more from the characters and the romantic relationships. But I So Enjoyed It overall! 

FREDERICA BY GEORGETTE HEYER – I've only read one book by Heyer, The Grand Sophy, and it was eight years ago. But I gave it five stars, so she's been on my bookish radar ever since! Heyer is considered the queen of Regency romance, and I couldn't wait to start this one. While I loved the family dynamics and humorous scenes, the story seemed to drag on forever. And the romance was the weakest part of the book to me! I wasn't invested in the couple at all, and I was bummed because I'd expected so much more. I'll probably try at least one more book from Heyer in the future, but this one didn't really work for me. I was So Okay With It.

CODE NAME VERITY BY ELIZABETH WEIN – The first time I read this book, I loved it. And I noted that I thought it was the type of book that "only gets better every time you revisit it." But that was six years ago, and I'd never re-read it since then. All I could remember was that it was slow and hard to get into at first, and I forgot what I loved. But I owned the audiobook, so I figured I'd give it a try. OH MY GOODNESS. Past Me was an idiot – this book is perfection, and my memory was the problem. Listening to it made the writing come to life in a new way, and I highly recommend that format. This book is meant to be read by such talented narrators! I'm So Obsessed With It.


PERSUASION BY JANE AUSTEN – Is there a more romantic moment in Austen’s novels than Wentworth’s letter to Anne at the end of of this one? And what is there to say about Persuasion that hasn’t been said before? I adore all of Austen’s novels, but this is probably my second favorite after Pride and Prejudice. It all works for me: the characters, the emotion, the uncertainty, the ending. I could go on! It’s a slower, quieter story, but I love how Austen gives us such an introspective heroine. And this book is probably why I’ll always have a soft spot for second chance romances! I listened to it on audio, and Juliet Stevenson did a lovely job narrating it. I'm So Obsessed With It.

COURTING DARKNESS BY ROBIN LAFEVERS – After re-reading the His Fair Assassin series, I couldn't wait to dive in to the first book is the new companion duology! Following Sybella (from the original trilogy) and another novitiate that we'd heard of but never met, I'm thrilled that LaFevers is continuing to explore this world! There's so much political intrigue and personal drama in this one, and I loved everything about it. I do think that it's best if you've read the other series first because you need all the background to appreciate the relationships and overall plot. It ends on a cliffhanger, but I'm eagerly anticipating the sequel. I'm So Obsessed With It!

A DANGEROUS COLLABORATION BY DEANNA RAYBOURN* – Veronica is an outspoken, adventurous heroine with a penchant for getting herself into trouble and a talent for solving mysteries. Her sidekick, Revelstoke Templeton-Vane, is slightly exasperated by her antics... but he's secretly swooning, too. The slow burn between them is my favorite, and each mystery has been fun and fascinating. This particular book takes Veronica and Stoker to a small island off the coast, which I loved! The isolated setting, atmospheric description of it, and the small circle of suspects added to the suspense. It gave the book a gothic vibe, and I'm So Obsessed With It. (Books 1, 2, and 3)


PETER PAN BY J.M. BARRIE – When I was scrolling through my Audible library, I noticed Peter Pan, narrated by Jim Dale. I can't even find the edition for sale now, but I know I've owned it for years. I've intended to read ever since it was chosen for my Consider This Classic feature. At five hours long, I finished it in one evening and loved Dale's narration. He was the highlight for me! I loved many of Barrie's turns of phrase, and there were endearing moments in the story. But, on the whole, it was much darker than I'd realized. It reminded me of Lord of the Flies – not exactly what I'd expected! I So Liked It, but it's not a classic I see myself revisiting.

HEART'S BLOOD BY JULIET MARILLIER – This historical fantasy is set in Ireland and loosely based on Beauty and the Beast. Marillier kept the familiar elements of the fairy tale — a castle, a curse, a flower, a beastly man, and beautiful girl — but fleshed it out in a way that was entirely her own. I loved noticing all the nods to the inspiration while still feeling as though I was reading something entirely new. Though I found the mystery incredibly obvious, it didn’t affect my enjoyment of this story. I loved the descriptive writing, the memorable secondary characters, and the subtle romance. And oh my, it was so atmospheric! The pace is on the slower side, but I still So Loved It.

EVERYONE BRAVE IS FORGIVEN BY CHRIS CLEAVE – Quite honestly, this is my least favorite read of the year so far and one I should have quit. Stilted dialogue, awful characters, tedious story. I started it on audio and made it almost halfway through before picking up the book so I could just skim to the end. I thought it might redeem itself, but it just kept getting worse. And while I understand it’s historically accurate, the repeated use of racial slurs and opinions felt gratuitous and problematic. The black characters only existed as character development for the white heroine, and it was done so offensively. I could rant about this in more detail, but the gist is I So Disliked It.


DEVIL'S DAUGHTER BY LISA KLEYPAS – I have loved West as a secondary character in the previous books and was so looking forward to seeing him find love. His story didn't disappoint! Phoebe was delightful, though I wanted to shake her a few times. Their banter and chemistry made them a fun couple. The children from her previous marriage were lovely additions to the story, and it was cute to see West win them over with his boyish antics. But the real MVP was Phoebe's dad – Sebastian St. Vincent, who readers originally met in the Wallflowers series. Bless his meddling ways! This might be my favorite of the series, and I So Loved It.

WHAT MATTERS IN JANE AUSTEN? BY JOHN MULLAN – It's almost impossible for me to resist books about or inspired by Jane Austen. This particular one has been on my shelves for years, and I'm so glad I finally read it. A few essays in here were so insightful that they will affect how I re-read Austen in the future (in a good way). The introduction and last two chapters, in particular, were excellent. Those were worth the price of the book, for me! But many others dragged and got repetitive. I’d recommend it to fellow Austen lovers — with the caveat that you may skim a bit. The writing isn't too scholarly, which I appreciated, too. I So Liked It

ENCHANTÉE BY GITA TRELEASE – Hello, gorgeous cover. Did I pre-order this based on its beauty and summary alone? Yes, I did. It's set in Paris during the French Revolution, but there's something special about Trelease's version of the world – it's got magic! I can't resist real events that have a creative twist, and it was done in such a believable way in this book. Trelease's writing was lovely, and I enjoyed how the heroine's personal struggles weren't overshadowed by the country's upheaval. However, I would have loved more development from the characters and the romance because I was never deeply invested in either. I So Liked It overall though! 


There were a few books that I won't be reviewing but wanted to mention. Wicked and the Wallflower by Sarah MacLean was a fun start to a new series, though it did feel long and overly dramatic at times. The romance was great, however, and I So Enjoyed It. I had similar feelings about Dreaming of You by Lisa Kleypas – nice romance and trope (devilish hero reformed by unconventional woman) but also felt it dragged on and got ridiculous. I'm a little torn on the rating but would probably say I So Enjoyed It. And finally, I read Just Like Heaven and A Night Like This by Julia Quinn, the first two books in the Smythe-Smith Quartet. I didn't particularly enjoy either one – mostly forgettable and boring with a few moments of cuteness. I'm So Okay With It but won't be continuing the series. 

*I received a copy of this book from the publisher for review consideration. This did not affect my opinion of the book or my review.

What have you been reading lately?

The Tearling is in My Trash

Oct 26, 2017

The Fate of the Tearling by Erika Johansen

Release Date: November 2016
Publisher: HarperCollins | Harper
Pages: 478 pages
Source & Format: Bought; Hardcover
Series: The Queen of the Tearling #3
Add on Goodreads

Sumamry (from Goodreads)
In less than a year, Kelsea Glynn has grown from an awkward teenager into a powerful monarch and a visionary leader.

And as she has come into her own as the Queen of the Tearling, she has transformed her realm. But in her quest to end corruption and restore justice, she has made many enemies - chief among them the evil and feared Red Queen, who ordered the armies of Mortmesne to march against the Tear and crush them.

To protect her people from such a devastating invasion, Kelsea did the unthinkable - naming the Mace, the trusted head of her personal guards, Regent in her place, she surrendered herself and her magical sapphires to her enemy. But the Mace will not rest until he and his men rescue their sovereign from her prison in Mortmesne. So, the endgame has begun and the fate of Queen Kelsea - and the Tearling itself - will be revealed...

Thoughts on The Fate of the Tearling
Several years ago, I read The Queen of the Tearling and fell in love with the unique world and powerful heroine. The The Fate of the Tearling went in an unexpected direction, but I still loved it. I was sold on Johansen's creativity and the way she wove multiple genres together. When The Fate of the Tearling came out last year, I'd planned to read it right away... but never got around to it. Since so much time had passed, I recently decided to re-read the first two before finishing the series. And that's where my problems started.

I did an audio re-read of The Queen of the Tearling and was surprised to discover that a narrator I'd previously liked just didn't click with the series. I've enjoyed everything else from Katherine Kellgren, but something about this book left me wanting more. There were times it felt like she was yelling and the forcefulness of her narration was off-putting. But I knew I'd finish it so much faster on audio, so I stuck with it. I still cared about the characters, but I wasn't as invested in the story. So, I changing my rating to So Enjoyed It.

Then, I started the audio for The Invasion of the Tearling. Davina Porter narrates that one, and I was immediately annoyed by the change. Although I didn't love Kellgren, I'm not a fan of mid-series narrator changes. Porter has a lovely voice, but she didn't fit the series either. Kelsea is a teenager, and Porter sounds so much older. The book isn't written in first person, but it still didn't strike the right tone for me. This is when I started to realize that re-reading really was making me like the books less. Things that I'd found creative and surprising on my first read felt weird upon re-reading. The pace dragged, which made me feel like it was taking forever to finish it. And by the time I did, I realized that it was just a So Liked It.

And finally, The Fate of the Tearling. Y'all, I HATED this book. I was so frustrated by:

1. The NUMEROUS plot holes.
2. The unnecessarily convoluted storylines.
3. The glacial pace.
4. The weird changes to several characters.
5. The horror movie demon spawn (because obviously this series needs one more genre added to it).
6. The anti-climatic "who is Kelsea's father?!" reveal.
7. The completely depressing tone.
8. The nonsensical way magic works in this world.
9. The super offensive anti-religion themes.
10. THE ENDING.

Y'all. I am so annoyed about numbers 1-9 on that list, but all of it pales in comparison to my utter rage at the ridiculous ending that invalidated the previous books. I want to talk about it here, but it would also be major spoilers. So, I'll be a good blogger and avoid them. But honestly, I think I might have preferred an ending where everyone died and the theme was essentially "utopian societies will never work because of human nature." Yeah. Everyone dying ranks higher on my wishlist than what actually happened.

WHAT A WASTE OF MY TIME. Can I rescind a recommendation? Because if so, that's what I'm doing. These books no longer have a place in my home. They're not technically in my trash because you better believe I want to get some credit at the used bookstore for them so I can rise from the ashes of this dumpster fire and buy myself something better as a consolation. I know everyone loves the phrase "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all," so just pretend this review had no words if that's how you want to live. 

Quick Lit: May 2017

Jun 30, 2017

One of my worst blogging habits is my inability to write about what I've read in a timely manner. So, I'm trying something new: recapping what I read at the end of each month and linking up to Modern Mrs. Darcy. I feel like "traditional" reviews have declined in popularity, although I'll still be writing some every month, so I'm hoping this will be a fun way to share what I'm reading. The exception will be review books that I can't discuss yet! 

Yes, you read the post's title correctly. I am finally posting my May Quick Lit. To be honest, I had most of these mini reviews written at the beginning of June but kept forgetting to take photos of the books. Oh well! 

If you missed it, in May I reviewed The Bone Season, The Mime Order and The Song Rising by Samantha Shannon, Disruption and Corruption by Jessica Shirvington and The Mothers by Brit Bennett. I reviewed a number of other books in June, but I'll link to those in my June Quick Lit post.


THE SEVEN HUSBANDS OF EVELYN HUGO BY TAYLOR JENKINS REID | I don't want to begrudge an author the opportunity to write in a new genre or try something completely different. But if I'd read this without the author's name attached, I'd never have guessed the truth in a million years. This didn't have any the trademark TJR qualities I've come to love, and it breaks my heart to say it. Every character in this book was incredibly unlikeable, a number of aspects of the plot were just too convenient, the ending was awful and the theme/message was done in such a heavy-handed way. I'm so very sad to say that I So Disliked It.*

A COURT OF WINGS AND RUIN BY SARAH J. MAAS | If I had to choose my "most anticipated book of 2017," it would be this one. I couldn't wait to get my hands on it, and re-reading the first two books in April just increased my excitement tenfold. Thankfully, it completely lived up to my expectations! The action was intense, the emotion was palpable, and I loved exploring more of the Courts in this world. But it was the characters who truly brought this book to life and have made this series an all-time favorite. I adore the Inner Circle - individually and as a group! While ACOMAF is the best in the series, ACOWAR was amazing and I'm So Obsessed With It.  

HUNTED BY MEAGAN SPOONER | This is a book that ended up on my radar because I kept seeing other bloggers talk about it. In this Beauty and the Beast retelling, Yeva (Beauty) must track down her father after he disappears while hunting a mysterious creature. Her search leads her to a ruined castle, a strange Beast and a curse. While I enjoyed the descriptive writing and the wintery fairy tale vibe, the pace was just so slow. It felt like nothing was happening! And I wasn't very invested in the characters, which was a bummer. I was So Okay With It overall, but I'm definitely in the minority with that opinion so it's probably worth a try for fans of retellings!


GOODNIGHT FROM LONDON BY JENNIFER ROBSON | Goodnight from London is set during WWII and is the story of an American journalist, Ruby Sutton, who is given the chance to move to London to report on the war. I thought the story had a lot of potential, the time period was well researched, and the focus on a war reporter felt unique among most of the WWII fiction I've read. However, it was just lacking that bit of oomph for me. I found most of the characters forgettable, the plot a bit too predictable (possibly because I've read a lot of this time period) and wasn't emotionally invested what was happening. I was So Okay With It for those reasons.*

THE ROYAL WE BY HEATHER COCKS & JESSICA MORGAN | This book is one of my all-time favorites - and not just because I love Go Fug Yourself and modern royalty! Bex Porter is an American who falls in love with Prince Nicholas, Great Britain's future king. It's loosely inspired by William and Kate, but it definitely stands on its own merits. You can read my original review for more in-depth thoughts on why I love the book so much, but I can now recommend the audiobook version, too! Narrator Christine Lakin was such a delight to listen to, and she somehow managed to make me love the book more - even though I was already So Obsessed With It

*I received a copy of this book from the publisher for review consideration. This did not affect my opinion of the book or my review.

Regrets in Rome

Aug 5, 2015

Rome in Love by Anita Hughes

Release Date: August 4, 2015
Publisher: Macmillan; St. Martin's Griffin
Pages: 320 pages
Source & Format: Publisher; ARC
Add on Goodreads

Summary (from Goodreads)
When Amelia Tate is cast to play the Audrey Hepburn role in a remake of Roman Holiday, she feels as if all her dreams have come true. She has a handsome boyfriend, is portraying her idol in a major motion picture, and gets to live in beautiful Rome for the next two months.

Once there, she befriends a young woman named Sophie with whom she begins to explore the city. Together, they discover all the amazing riches that Rome has to offer. But when Amelia’s boyfriend breaks up with her over her acting career, her perfect world begins to crumble.

While moping in her hotel suite, Amelia discovers a stack of letters written by Audrey Hepburn that start to put her own life into perspective. Then, she meets Philip, a handsome journalist who is under the impression that she is a hotel maid, and it appears as if things are finally looking up. The problem is she can never find the right time to tell Philip her true identity. Not to mention that Philip has a few secrets of his own. Can Amelia finally have both the career and love that she’s always wanted, or will she be forced to choose again?

Thoughts on Rome in Love
As a lover of all things Audrey Hepburn, I knew I couldn't pass up on a book inspired by Roman Holiday. It's one of my favorite films, and I've always thought that the movie would make a great book! I had high hopes, even though I didn't quite know what to expect. But I figured I was in for an adventure in Italy either way!

Amelia Tate never expected to be cast in the remake of Roman Holiday, especially not in the starring role. All eyes are on the newcomer playing the role that Audrey Hepburn made famous, and Amelia hopes she's up for the challenge. It should be an exciting time in her life, but there's drama with her boyfriend back at home and lots of attention in the spotlight. Amelia needs an escape, and she finds it in the streets of Rome. Add in a new friend, a handsome journalist and an undiscovered treasure, and you've got Rome in Love.

I think the oddest part about this book for me is that it frequently referenced Roman Holiday and put the heroine in a story that's remarkably similar to that film. I knew before I started the book that the main character was starring in a remake of Roman Holiday, so I expected the story to focus on her life on set, her take on this classic role, her interactions with the press, and the pressure of life in the spotlight. I assumed Amelia would have her own story, and the setting would be a fun nod to one of my favorite movies. I didn't realize that the book was essentially just going to modernize and retell Roman Holiday.

There are numerous aspects of Amelia's story that are pulled almost straight from the movie, and I actually found it distracting. How could she be starring in this supposedly huge remake and fail to see all the ways her own life was mirroring the movie? It was hard for me to suspend my disbelief, and I ended up wishing that the book had been either a Roman Holiday retelling without the movie storyline or a different story that incorporated the idea of an actress starring in Roman Holiday remake. By combining the retelling and the movie remake story, it felt less creative and more recycled. 

But I think those aspects of the plot wouldn't have bothered me as much if the writing had been better. Unfortunately, however, I had some major issues with it. Rome in Love definitely suffers from telling instead of showing. The first three paragraphs of the first chapter start with "Amelia stood...," "Amelia smoothed..." and "Amelia tried..." A few pages later, it's "Amelia heard...," "Amelia blinked" and "Amelia remembered..." and this continued for the rest of the book. It sounds nitpicky, but it became tedious to read. 

There were also a lot of detailed descriptions of what characters were wearing, eating or seeing, and it didn't happen in a way that felt natural or fluid to the story. It was a little jarring and largely irrelevant. I wanted Rome to come alive - to feel like I was there with Amelia and to be able to see it in my mind. But that just never happened. There was barely any energy in the story, and it prevented me from emotionally connecting to the main character or becoming invested in what I was reading.

I almost called it quits before the end of Rome in Love, and it might have been better if I had. This book didn't work for me, but it might have partly been my mood or the timing. I wish there was more I could say in its favor, but I just wasn't the right reader for it in the end. If you do pick it up, I hope you enjoy it!
*I received a copy of this book from the publisher for review consideration. This did not affect my opinion of the book or my review.

The Opposite of Impressed

Oct 17, 2014

First Impressions by Charlie Lovett

Release Date: October 16, 2014
Publisher: Penguin | Viking
Pages: 320 pages
Source & Format: NetGalley; e-ARC
Add on Goodreads

Summary (from Goodreads)
Charlie Lovett first delighted readers with his New York Times bestselling debut, The Bookman’s Tale. Now, Lovett weaves another brilliantly imagined mystery featuring one of English literature’s most popular and beloved authors: Jane Austen.

Book lover and Austen enthusiast Sophie Collingwood has recently taken a job at an antiquarian bookshop in London when two different customers request a copy of the same obscure book: the second edition of Little Book of Allegories by Richard Mansfield. Their queries draw Sophie into a mystery that will cast doubt on the true authorship of Pride and Prejudice—and ultimately threaten Sophie’s life.

In a dual narrative that alternates between Sophie’s quest to uncover the truth—while choosing between two suitors—and a young Jane Austen’s touching friendship with the aging cleric Richard Mansfield, Lovett weaves a romantic, suspenseful, and utterly compelling novel about love in all its forms and the joys of a life lived in books.

DNF Thoughts on First Impressions

Note: I stopped reading First Impressions at 20%.
Contains spoiler-y comments on the beginning of the book. 

First Impressions was one of my most anticipated fall releases. As a HUGE Jane Austen fan, I wanted to read it as soon as I saw that it was "a novel of old books, unexpected love, and Jane Austen." It sounds like everything I love, and I was thrilled when I got a copy on NetGalley. As much as I love Austen's work, I also enjoy spin-offs and variations. I'm not an Austen purist - I'm totally open to new interpretations! So, I'm typically not bothered by an author taking some liberties. Unfortunately, I was unable to finish this book... and I think it's because I'm almost too familiar with Jane Austen and her life.

First Impressions alternates between two time periods: present day and Jane Austen's time (1790s-1817). In the portions set during Austen's time near the beginning of the book, Austen is in her twenties. She meets an older man named Mr. Mansfield (he's in his eighties), and they establish a friendship. At this point, she hasn't written a full book yet but is working on an epistolary novel that will eventually become Sense & Sensibility. Mansfield, just to note, is an entirely fictional character. He did not actually exist, so the "historical" portions are really an invented version of history (not a fictionalized version of Austen's actual life). I was expecting the Austen portions to be more realistic, which definitely threw me off from the start.

Mansfield and Austen have long conversations about books and spend lots of time together (presumably alone). During those chats, she reads him samples of her writing. She goes away at one point, and they continue their friendship by correspondence. Not only do I find it a little unbelievable that Jane would be spending that much time alone with a man (regardless of his age), but I find it even more of a stretch to believe that she would be writing him letters. Men and women could spend time alone together during that time period, but the rules for correspondence were much stricter. If letters were being exchanged by people of the opposite sex, it was typically a sign that they were engaged. And if they weren't, it was a breach of propriety (just look at Marianne and Willoughby). I have no idea if the age gap would make it less improper for Austen and Mansfield to correspond, but at that point I was questioning everything that I was reading. It just didn't feel like it fit within the time period! Then, Jane begins to discover that she loves him. But it's not as a lover or a parent? I don't even know.
It was not, she knew, the ache of a lover [...] but she found that she could no longer think of him merely as a friend or companion. (11%) 
It's well known that Jane never married, but there has been a lot of speculation as to whether or not she ever had a romantic relationship. Obviously, this book is a work of fiction. But I wanted it to at least present a version that felt a little bit plausible! But Jane falling for someone who could be her grandfather? Ugh. It's particularly annoying since, prior to that, there are a number of comments suggesting there was no possibility for romance.

However, that's not what I hated about the book. I can accept the somewhat questionable development of their friendship and the unwelcome introduction of romantic feelings. But what I could not abide were the contents of their conversations. Let me explain. As Jane begins reading her writing aloud to Mr. Mansfield, he offers her suggestions for improvement. Prior to the conversation below, he has just told her how she could improve the character of Sir John Middleton in Sense & Sensibility. Then, they have this exchange:
"It is, I think," said Mr. Mansfield, "the sign of a well-crafted novel when the minor characters are as fully realized as the hero and heroine." 
"Wisely spoken, Mr. Mansfield. And I am certainly guilty of giving less life to those whose time upon the page of my novel is but brief. It is a fault I shall endeavor to correct." (6%)
WHAT?! This was very early on in the book, and I was immediately pissed. To have Jane Austen say that she isn't good at writing secondary characters... Are you kidding me?! Jane Austen wrote extensively as a teenager - long before she wrote her first full-length novel. Many of her short stories can still be read today, and anyone who has taken two seconds to read them would see that Austen's wit and keen eye for characters was already on display. They aren't as polished as her later works, but her talent is still evident.

I found the implication that Jane Austen needed the help of an eighty-year-old man to improve and instruct her on writing to be insulting and absolutely ridiculous. Jane Austen is my homegirl, and I will not stand by and see her treated thus. At one point, Mr. Mansfield offers this oh-so-helpful advice on Willoughby:
"I only feel that when Mr. Willoughyby first comes into the lives of the Dashwoods, one already gets the sense that he is a scoundrel. The shock of Miss Marianne's rejection would be so much more powerful if we had no reason to suspect Willoughby of duplicity until his true character is revealed." 
"So Willoughby should come onto the stage as more of a hero?" 
"Exactly. That is precisely how I should put it. I do hope you do not think me impertinent to say so." (11%)
GET REAL. At that point, I was rolling my eyes and feeling stabby. There's no way I could continue to read a book that implied (even if fictionally) that Jane Austen's books were good because this old man helped her make them that way or that some of the best parts were things that he told her to do. It's a stupid premise, and I hated it! Maybe it was supposed to show that Jane finally met someone who was her intellectual match. Unfortunately, it didn't read that way to me. It basically came across like this totally annoying and fictional old man is how Jane Austen became an incredible writer. NOPE NOPE NOPE.

I'm pretty sure that, if I had continued, one of the "mysteries" concerned the authorship of one of Austen's books and the question of whether or not she had plagiarized Mr. Mansfield. I'm sorry, y'all, but I don't have the patience for that kind of nonsense. In my world, that's basically blasphemy. We DO NOT speak so of Austen.

The portions set in the present day were annoying, but a little less so because I obviously didn't care about that heroine (Sophie) outside the context of the novel. However, I did find a number of things totally ridiculous in the modern portion, too. For example, Sophie's beloved uncle dies (from falling down the stairs while reading a book?!), and she immediately recalls a conversation where he told her to never read and walk. She then becomes absolutely convinced that he was murdered. What? It was so out of nowhere that I was flipping back a few pages to see if I had missed something, anything, that would have implied there was foul play and supported Sophie's radical leap to murder. When I realized I'd read everything correctly, I knew I was done.

I never write DNF reviews because I don't want to "review" a book that I didn't finished reading. However, I typically stop reading a book because I'm not hooked on it - not because I actively dislike what I'm reading. Since I had very specific reasons for my DNF and had a lot to say about it, I decided to share my thoughts. However, I can't speak to the novel as a whole because I don't know how it ends. So, I'm not rating it on Goodreads or on my blog. However, as an Austen fan, I thought it was awful. I wanted to punch Mr. Mansfield and toss the book across the room... Maybe the book will pull a Mr. Darcy and improve upon further acquaintance. Unfortunately, I found it barely "tolerable, and not [good] enough to tempt me" to finish and find out. I'm sorry First Impressions, but "you are wasting your time with me.''

*I received a copy of this book from the publisher for review consideration. This did not affect my opinion of the book or my review.

No Recovery From This Fumble

Oct 6, 2014

The One & Only by Emily Giffin

Release Date: May 20, 2014
Publisher: Random House | Ballantine
Pages: 432 pages
Source & Format: Bought; Hardcover
Add on Goodreads

Summary (from Goodreads)
Thirty-three-year-old Shea Rigsby has spent her entire life in Walker, Texas—a small college town that lives and dies by football, a passion she unabashedly shares. Raised alongside her best friend, Lucy, the daughter of Walker’s legendary head coach, Clive Carr, Shea was too devoted to her hometown team to leave. Instead she stayed in Walker for college, even taking a job in the university athletic department after graduation, where she has remained for more than a decade.

But when an unexpected tragedy strikes the tight-knit Walker community, Shea’s comfortable world is upended, and she begins to wonder if the life she’s chosen is really enough for her. As she finally gives up her safety net to set out on an unexpected path, Shea discovers unsettling truths about the people and things she has always trusted most—and is forced to confront her deepest desires, fears, and secrets.

The One & Only is a luminous novel about finding your passion, following your heart, and, most of all, believing in something bigger than yourself... the one and only thing that truly makes life worth living.

Thoughts on The One & Only
I picked up my first Emily Giffin book in college. I think a friend loaned me a copy of Something Borrowed, but the memory is hazy now. Either way, I’ve since read all of Giffin’s books and even attended her signing in Atlanta for her last release, Where We Belong. I have mixed feelings on her books, to be honest, because I enjoy reading them but also typically have major issues with the choices or character traits depicted in them.

Characters don't have to be likeable in order for me to enjoy a book, but I do need to find them interesting or compelling. Giffin has a habit of writing about women who are, to me, rather unlikeable and are often very selfish. They aren’t necessarily characters that I’d want as my friend, and yet they still seem realistic. And I almost always find them fascinating heroines because Giffin's books are just so readable! However, I’ve also noticed that her books often involve cheating – whether it’s a woman who is cheating (or considering it) or one who has been cheated on. This is usually what I struggle with most when I read her books. I mention this because I’ve read every book from Giffin – some I’ve certainly liked more than others – and they always make me think, even when I dislike things in them.

So, in some ways, The One and Only is a typical Giffin novel. The main character, Shea Rigsby, reminded me of other Giffin heroines (though personally she was my least favorite to read about). There's a lot of football in The One and Only. While I'm from the South and love cheering on the Dawgs, I do not care about football in general. Instead of weaving football into the book seamlessly, it felt clunky, dull and (at times) unnecessary. This may have just been an issue for me because of my lack of interest in the topic. Either way, I found a lot of the football stuff really boring.

Sadly, when I wasn't bored, I was infuriated or disgusted. Despite the fact that Giffin regularly tackles topics like cheating, I still think The One and Only is her most divisive book yet. I HATED IT. I don't want to spoil anything in the book, so I don't feel like I can really share all the reasons why. But I will say that I pre-ordered this book (as I've done with Giffin's last few releases) and absolutely will not be doing so for her books in the future. I was uncomfortable with the romance and found the ending absolutely ridiculous. The dynamics between the couple made me feel so gross - NOT A FAN AT ALL. Y'all, I was basically hate reading this and just hoping it would get better. It didn't. It had nothing to do with (highlight to read) the age difference, and everything to do with the fact that it read like incest and had the most disturbing relationship dynamic.

And there are so many relevant and difficult issues raised in The One and Only - domestic violence, sexual assault, integrity in athletics and turning a blind eye to misconduct. There were a lot of things brought up in The One and Only that provided Giffin the opportunity to explore some really serious subjects. Instead, I found the depiction problematic, largely unresolved and inserted for more for the sake of drama than anything else. If you want to go there, I think there needs to be an extra level of awareness and caution in the way it's handled or discussed. But to essentially bring up these issues and then ignore them or treat them flippantly to focus on the love story? UGH.

I don't think I've ever been this disappointed in a book. If it had been written by anyone else, I wouldn't even have finished. As I've said, Giffin frequently writes about flawed characters and complicated relationships, and I assume that's what she was trying to do with The One and Only. This should have been nothing new, and yet I still spent the whole book legitimately irritated by what I was reading. Unfortunately, I don't personally recommend it - but it does seem like a book you either love or hate. Sadly, I fall into the "hate" category.

Lying Through Your Teeth

Apr 14, 2014

We Were Liars by E. Lockhart

Release Date: May 13, 2014
Publisher: Random House | Delacorte
Pages: 240 pages
Source & Format: NetGalley; e-ARC
Amazon | Goodreads

Summary (from Goodreads)
A beautiful and distinguished family.
A private island.
A brilliant, damaged girl; a passionate, political boy.
A group of four friends - the Liars - whose friendship turns destructive.
A revolution. An accident. A secret.
Lies upon lies.
True love.
The truth.

We Were Liars is a modern, sophisticated suspense novel from National Book Award finalist and Printz Award honoree E. Lockhart.

Read it.
And if anyone asks you how it ends, just LIE.

Thoughts on We Were Liars
I'm really not sure what to say about We Were Liars, and I don't think I've ever been this conflicted about a book before. I'm going to briefly share four things I think you need to know about We Were Liars, followed three reasons (one of them very vague) why this book just didn't work for me.

Four Things To Know About This Book:

1. The less you know the better.
I absolutely agree with all the reviews that say the less you know about this story the better. The climactic moment of We Were Liars hinges on a major plot twist that you don't want to know beforehand. The book is narrated by Cady - the "brilliant, damaged girl" described in the summary - who has no memory of the "accident." If you're like me, you'll spend a lot of the time leading up to the twist trying to guess what exactly happened. But it's better if you don't have any real idea what's coming.

2. The hype machine is in full gear for this book.
To be honest, I can't remember the last time there was this much hype surrounding a book. I feel like so many of the early reviews for this book have been fawning proclamations of love. There's nothing wrong with that at all - it's awesome when people are really passionate about a book. I'm just not in that camp with this one. I spent most of the book confused but still enjoying what I was reading. Until I wasn't. And then I never recovered my former positive feelings.

3. The writing style is lyrical, but it's also very confusing and disjointed.
One thing I really liked, particularly in the beginning, is the writing style. It's confusing and hard to connect to, but it's also really different and memorable. You can tell that Cady isn't totally mentally sound from the way it's narrated, so I think it was a fitting decision to write the book this way. But it's also really frustrating at times. The disjointedness started to grate on my nerves by the end, but I can still admit that I think I get the reasoning behind it.

4. The story will leave you talking.
Whether or not you like this book, you'll probably want to talk about it. This is nothing like the other books I've previously read by Lockhart, except that I think most of her books provoke some kind of discussion. I can absolutely say that I wanted to talk about this book by the time I closed the last page. I had so many thoughts, and it was the first time I wasn't able to rate a book on Goodreads immediately after finishing. I had to take time to sort through my feelings, which were incredibly intense and conflicted.

Three Reasons It Didn't Work For Me:

1. The characters and their relationships.
I'm not sure if it's because of the way it was written or the brevity of the book, but I really struggled with these characters and their relationships. They are almost all unlikeable (not a deal breaker for me), but what bothered me more was that I found certain elements of their interactions and conversations to be almost unbelievable. It required too much of a suspension of my disbelief for me to really buy into the story. The twist left me completely emotionless because I didn't care about these people who were mostly awful, very entitled and made such stupid decisions.

2. The twist was one of my biggest bookish pet peeves / deal breakers.
I can't say what the twist was because that would spoil it, and I promise not to do that. However, I do have to acknowledge that I actively avoid books that use this element for a story's resolution or as an explanation for the majority of the plot. I find it incredibly frustrating when a book I've become invested uses this particular element, so my reaction to this book was definitely affected by my personal dislike of books with this kind of twist.

3. The way I felt when it ended.
A lot of early reviews have indicated that you should have tissues nearby when reading because the book left them in tears. I felt absolutely none of that when I turned the last page. My overall emotion was anger and complete frustration. There was nothing hopeful for me about the way We Were Liars ends. It's an ending that doesn't really provide much closure, and it sort of highlighted all the issues I was having with the book by that point. I can't stand how conflicted I still feel about this book.

Why Can't I Rate It?
I developed a new rating system not that long ago, but I can't use it for this book. There's really no fair way to assign one of my rating phrases to We Were Liars. I think many readers will love it - there is a reason it's being hyped this much - but I wasn't one of them. I don't want to discourage anyone from reading it because I know some of my feelings were based on my personal dislike for one of the elements that is crucial to the conclusion of this story. No book works for everyone, and this one definitely didn't for me.

So Quotable
"It was love, and it hit me so hard I leaned against the screen door that still stood between us, just to stay vertical. I wanted to touch him like he was a bunny, a kitten, something so special and soft your fingertips can't leave it alone. The universe was good because he was in it. I loved the hole in his jeans and the dirt on his bare feet and the scab on his elbow and the scar that laced through one eyebrow."

*I received a copy of this book from Delacorte in exchange for an honest review. I was not compensated in any way.

Love In A Hopeless Place

Mar 12, 2014


The Bronze HorsemanTatiana and Alexander and The Summer Garden by Paullina Simons

Release Date: 
September 2009 (orig. 2000) | July 2010 (orig. January 2003) | June 2011 (orig. 2006)
Publisher: HarperCollins | William Morrow
Pages: 810 pages | 559 pages | 752 pages
Source & Format: Bought; Paperback
Series: The Bronze Horseman #1-3
Amazon | Goodreads

Summary of The Bronze Horseman (from Goodreads)
The golden skies, the translucent twilight, the white nights, all hold the promise of youth, of love, of eternal renewal. The war has not yet touched this city of fallen grandeur, or the lives of two sisters, Tatiana and Dasha Metanova, who share a single room in a cramped apartment with their bother and parents. Their world is turned upside down when Hitler's armies attack Russia and begin their unstoppable blitz to Leningrad.

Yet there is light in the darkness. Tatiana meets Alexander, a brave young officer in the Red Army. Strong and self-confident, yet guarding a mysterious and troubled past, he is drawn to Tatiana and she to him. Starvation, desperation, and fear soon grip their city during the terrible winter of the merciless German siege. Tatiana and Alexander's impossible love threatens to tear the Metanova family apart and expose the dangerous secret Alexander so carefully protects, a secret as devastating as the war itself, as the lovers are swept up in the brutal tides that will change the world and their lives forever.

Thoughts on The Bronze Horseman (Spoiler Free!)
I've already written a bit on my love for The Bronze Horseman in my The Favorite Factor: Giveaway Edition post. I first heard about this book when Lorren reviewed it and later bought the Kindle copy when it was on sale. For some reason, I just let it sit around unread. When Kelly started book pushing it, I figured it was time that I finally give this book a shot. I started it on a day when I didn't have work because of snow... and finished it that evening. Yep, I read all 810 pages in one day. It was EPIC!

I'm planning on talking about this book (and the series overall) in a new review feature that I'm working on with Kelly, but I thought it was still worth writing up my brief thoughts on this series. As a huge fan of historical fiction, I was already predisposed to like this book. I haven't read much set in Russia, and I really loved learning about what the country experienced during WWII. Most of the fiction I've read during that time period is set in countries like Germany / England / France, so it was nice to read about it from a new setting.

There was so much I loved about this book - the characters who are unlikeable and selfish at times but also loyal and loving, the harsh reality of the setting, the constant struggle to survive, the descriptiveness of the writing, and the emotions this story evoked. But it's also not the book for everyone. Simons revels in descriptions, in angst, in painful barriers that keep the couple apart. I actually think you'll be able to tell early on in the story if this book will work for you. If you're bored in the beginning, you're probably not going to love the rest of it. 

All that being said, I truly debated on how to rate this one. I'd expected to give it my highest rating, but I've really it's not actually going to fall into that category. I read this book while texting Kelly the whole time, and I think I would have been more critical of certain things in it if I was reading it on my own. For example, there's a section of this book that I basically skipped over because of its sexual content. I don't personally like when that is a large part of a book, and it's the one thing I felt took up way too many pages without contributing much at all to the actual plot in this book. 

However, I did fall in love with this story while I was reading it! There's a lot of drama, but I was totally hooked the entire time. It was the perfect read to pass a snowy day.

Thoughts on Tatiana and Alexander (Spoiler Free!)
Once you've finished The Bronze Horseman, you'll be racing to read book two as soon as possible! Well, you will if you loved the first book. And you'll be pleased to know that this is a wonderful companion that I do recommend!

This book picks up after the ending of The Bronze Horseman, which I promise not to spoil for you. So, what do you need to know about book two? Well, Tatiana and Alexandra is more Alexander's story than Tatiana's (although she does have her own part). There are flashbacks to his life growing up, which I annoyed me at first (I just wanted to get back to the story at hand) but ultimately added depth to his character. I liked being able to learn more about him and find out who he was, what mattered to him, etc. It was nice to see him on his own - and not just through Tatiana's eyes!

There was a lot less drama and angst in this book, and more of a focus on the historical fiction elements. It felt more focused and less indulgent, which I appreciated since there were a few too many moments in the first book that just didn't contribute to the overall story or plot. The only thing that annoyed me in this one? There was a part of this book that just re-hashed the events of the first book. In something this long, that felt out-of-place and frustrating since I'd just finished The Bronze Horseman. As much as I loved it, I didn't need to read about it all over again.

The ending to Tatiana and Alexander was perfect! It was resolved and hopeful, which is a great after how much heartache takes place in its pages. I recommend concluding this series with this book because I don't recommend the final book at all. It was a terrible ending for a series I really loved up to that point, so I'm happy to say that you can happily end here without any cliffhangers or unresolved story lines.

Thoughts on The Summer Garden (Spoiler Free!)
Okay, I've got to be completely honest: I absolutely hated this book. And I mean passionately hated. I cannot think of a worse series ending, and I would not have continued reading this book if I hadn't been reading it with Kelly. Y'all, it was bad... like possibly one of the worst books I've ever read levels of horrible.

After researching a little online, Kelly and I discovered that Simons originally intended for the series to be two books and included an epilogue in Tatiana and Alexandra (which was previously titled The Bridge to Holy Cross). I'm not sure why Simons decided to continue with the series, but I think it's so unfortunate that she did choose to do so with this book as her ending.

The Summer Garden takes everything you've come to know and love about the characters... and abolishes it. The characters become the worst versions of themselves: selfish, hateful, mean, cold, abusive and completely disconnected from one another. I am, truthfully, astonished at the number of five-star reviews this book has received. I wasn't rooting for these characters at any point in time because I was too busy being completely disgusted by them. I think you can have beloved characters make mistakes if you're then able to redeem them, but that didn't happen in this book. Actions were justified, excuses made, things overlooked... it was almost painful for me to read this book because I was so angry about what was happening. I realize I haven't written anything about what does happen, but that's because I don't even want to revisit it or try to explain how miserable this was to read.

This book glorifies a relationship that is the complete opposite of loving or healthy. There is not a single part of me that would hand someone this book and call it a love story. A train wreck? Sure. But a love story? HELL NO. I could rant FOR DAYS about all the things I disliked in this book and how confused I am by how it's rated as favorably as the first two books. Frankly, I'm pissed that it even says "A Love Story" on the cover.

Let me rant for a second: love is not just an emotion but an action, too. Feelings can change, shift and sway... they aren't the basis for real love. Real, true love that deserves to be celebrated is seen in actions. And there is a reason people say actions speak louder than words. The kind of love that I want to celebrate is when it's sacrificial and willing to put someone else's needs first. This book made me so mad because I hate that anyone would read this and would call it "love." What an insult to that word!

All of that being said, I do not recommend this book. Not even a little bit. Stop after book two!

Revolutionary Ridiculousness

Jun 6, 2013

The Turncoat by Donna Thorland

Release Date: March 2013
Publisher: Penguin
Pages: 395 pages
Series: Renegades of the Revolution #1
Source & Format: Bought; Paperback
Amazon Goodreads

Summary (from Goodreads)
Major Lord Peter Tremayne is the last man rebel bluestocking Kate Grey should fall in love with, but when the handsome Bristish viscount commandeers her home, Kate throws caution to the wind and responds to his seduction. She is on the verge of surrender when a spy in her own household seizes the opportunity to steal the military dispatches Tremayne carries, ensuring his disgrace - and implicating Kate in high treason. Painfully awakened to the risks of war, Kate determines to put duty ahead of desire, and offers General Washington her services as an undercover agent in the City of Brotherly Love.

Months later, having narrowly escaped court martial and hanging, Tremayne returns to decadent, British-occupied Philadelphia with no stomach for his current assignment - to capture the woman he believes betrayed him. Nor does he relish the glittering entertainments being held for General Howe's idle officers. Worse, the glamorous woman in the midst of this social whirl, the fiancée of his own cousin, is none other than Kate Grey herself. And so begins their dangerous dance, between passion and patriotism, between certain death and the promise of a brave new future.

Thoughts on The Turncoat
Readers of this review should note a few things before continuing on. First, I love historical fiction and have desperately wanted some more set during the Revolutionary War. Second, I was highly anticipating this debut novel. So much so that I went to Barnes & Noble on its release day and asked them to get it out of the back for me (since it still hadn't been unpacked). Third, I always try to be respectful in my critical reviews. Unfortunately, I'm about to be majorly rant-y in this one. Also, I am going to spoil certain things in this book because I just have to do it in order to make my point. So, if you're absolutely dying to read this and want to have no idea what happens, just skim or skip this review. You've been warned.

Here's what I thought I was going to get with The Turncoat - a well-written historical fiction novel that included some awesome spying by a feisty heroine! My expectations were sky-high. Shoot, I'd already told a fellow Revolutionary War lover to put this book on her TBR. So, when I started feeling distraught over the turn this book was taking in the first forty pages or so, I soldiered on. Because it had to get better, right?

Kate Grey is a Quaker, which also means she's a pacifist. We're also told that she wears plain clothing and is not very worldly. While that certainly simplifies and in no way addresses what it means to be a Quaker, I point it out because it's a few things you're told about her and are also likely to expect from a Quaker character.

Well, Kate's father goes off to join the war efforts and she's left at home with some woman who turns out to a spy. Surprise! Before her dad took off for the fight, he left some very important papers that absolutely couldn't get into the wrong hands. Which they obviously did because Kate is a total nincompoop and gives the hiding spot away with her eyes. But fine. Let's move past that. The man who finds the papers, Peter Tremayne, is just so entranced by plain and unexperienced Kate that he tells her that she can have the papers back if she leaves her bedroom door open that night. SO SHE DOES. Because that's not completely out of character for a Quaker. No big deal.

Their little tryst or whatever gets interrupted, and he takes off. But, oh the joy, Kate's somehow infatuated with him and wants to be a spy now. Cue an episode where she sees her friend ripped from her home and raped, and then Kate is chased on horseback with her lady spy friend shooting from the saddle like this is some modern-day movie where the guns are that accurate. Sorry, but I'm just not buying it. Not in the least.

So, Kate becomes this expert spy that entrances everyone and fits right into their rich and worldly circles. To the point that she gets engaged to this English psycho who has a terrible reputation because he rapes and plunders wherever he goes. But it's not all for show! She's like legit attracted to this man. Who is Peter's cousin (or is he?). Who she is also still in love with or whatever. After he basically propositioned her for sex in order for her to get the damn letter back. Okay.

There's some spying and shenanigans, like torture, but there's also love (is that what this is?) and sex. And rape. Did I mention the rape? Because it's in there. And Kate just keeps charming everyone even though she hasn't got a single fault or defining characteristic. She's just Kate! Yay! And she's supposedly a Quaker but there's no real evidence that it has any meaning to her or influence over her actions. So why in the heck make her a Quaker in the first place?

Seriously, the characters in this book make no sense. They do things to further the plot along, but not things that actually fit who they are and/or are supposed to be. There was little to no character development. The villain was horrible but of course Quaker Kate wanted him. And his cousin. FOR NO DAMN REASON THAT I COULD TELL. And who are these idiot men that are so moved by this woman that they make terrible decisions? Aren't they supposed to be a little smarter and not so easily manipulated? Why do these people like each other? Why are they acting this way? I can't tell you. Oh wait, yes I can. They're acting that way so that things happen in the book. But I can't discern a motivation beyond that.

Basically, this was like a bodice ripper. And it had paper-thin characters. I didn't want a historical romance. Not ripping on people who love that genre, but it's not really my thing. So I was really frustrated because it's not what I expected from this one. AND HOLY CRAP IF I'M ACTUALLY READING A ROMANCE SHOULDN'T IT BE ROMANTIC?! Because I'm not rooting for  a guy that justifies his cousin's terrible actions by being like "Meh. We've all done it. Welcome to the war." Really? REALLY?!

The plot just seemed ridiculous, the characters were annoying as hell, and most of it just made me LOL in a way that definitely wasn't intended. So, yeah, I was so pissed about this book that made my husband listen to me rant about all the reasons it was the most disappointing thing I've read this year (ever?).
Clearly, this book brought out the worst in me as a reader and a reviewer. I will say that The Turncoat has a ton of four- and five-star reviews on Goodreads so maybe I'm one of the few that just didn't like it. Who knows! I just can't. My eyes are rolling just remembering it all. 
© So Obsessed With • Theme by Maira G.